Stable Diffusion — Architecture & Fine-Tuning

Learning Objectives

• Trace the five pieces of a Stable Diffusion pipeline: VAE, text encoder, U-Net, scheduler, safety checker — and what each of them actually does
• Explain latent diffusion and why training in a 4x64x64 latent space (instead of a 3x512x512 image) reduces compute by 48x without quality loss
• Use diffusers to generate images, run image-to-image, inpainting, and ControlNet-guided generation
• Fine-tune Stable Diffusion with LoRA on a small custom dataset and load the LoRA adapter at inference

The Problem

Training a DDPM directly on 512x512 RGB images is expensive. Every training step backprops through a U-Net that sees 3x512x512 = 786,432 input values, and sampling takes 50+ forward passes through that same U-Net. At the quality level of Stable Diffusion 1.5 (released 2022), pixel-space diffusion would need roughly 256 GPU-months of training and 10-30 seconds per image on a consumer GPU.

The trick that made open-weight text-to-image practical was latent diffusion (Rombach et al., CVPR 2022). Train a VAE that maps a 3x512x512 image to a 4x64x64 latent tensor and back, then do the diffusion in that latent space. Compute drops by (3*512*512)/(4*64*64) = 48x. Sampling drops from tens of seconds to under two seconds on the same GPU.

Almost every modern image-generation model — SDXL, SD3, FLUX, HunyuanDiT, Wan-Video — is a latent diffusion model with variations on the autoencoder, the denoiser (U-Net or DiT), and the text conditioning. Learn Stable Diffusion and you have learnt the template.

The Concept

The pipeline

• VAE — frozen autoencoder. Encoder turns image into latents (used for img2img and training). Decoder turns latents back into an image.
• Text encoder — CLIP text encoder (SD 1.x/2.x), CLIP-L + CLIP-G (SDXL), or T5-XXL (SD3/FLUX). Produces a sequence of token embeddings.
• U-Net — the denoiser. Has cross-attention layers that attend from latents to the text embedding at every resolution level.
• Scheduler — the sampling algorithm (DDIM, Euler, DPM-Solver++). Picks sigmas, blends predicted noise back into the latent.
• Safety checker — optional NSFW / illegal-content filter on the output image.

Classifier-free guidance (CFG)

Plain text conditioning learns epsilon_theta(x_t, t, c) for every prompt c. CFG trains the same network with c dropped 10% of the time (replaced by an empty embedding), giving a single model that predicts both the conditional and the unconditional noise. At inference:

\epsilon = \epsilon_{\text{uncond}} + w \cdot (\epsilon_{\text{cond}} - \epsilon_{\text{uncond}})

w is the guidance scale. w=0 is unconditional, w=1 is plain conditional, w>1 pushes the output toward being "more conditioned on the prompt" at the cost of diversity. SD default is w=7.5.

CFG is the reason text-to-image works at production quality. Without it, prompts bias the output weakly; with it, prompts dominate.

Latent space geometry

The VAE's 4-channel latent is not just a compressed image. It is a manifold where arithmetic roughly corresponds to semantic edits (prompt engineering + interpolation both live here), and where the diffusion U-Net has been trained to spend its entire modelling budget. Decoding a random 4x64x64 latent does not produce a random-looking image — it produces garbage, because only a specific submanifold of latents decodes to valid images.

Two consequences:

1. Img2img = encode image to latent, add partial noise, run the denoiser, decode. Image structure survives because encoding is near-invertible; content changes based on the prompt.
2. Inpainting = same as img2img but the denoiser only updates masked regions; unmasked regions are kept at the encoded latent.

The U-Net architecture

The SD U-Net is a big version of the TinyUNet from Lesson 10 with three additions:

• Transformer blocks at every spatial resolution, containing self-attention + cross-attention to the text embedding.
• Time embedding via MLP on sinusoidal encoding.
• Skip connections between encoder and decoder at matching resolutions.

Total parameters in SD 1.5: ~860M. SDXL: ~2.6B. FLUX: ~12B. The jump in params is mostly in attention layers.

LoRA fine-tuning

Full fine-tuning of Stable Diffusion needs 20+ GB of VRAM and updates 860M parameters. LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) keeps the base model frozen and injects small rank-decomposition matrices into the attention layers. A LoRA adapter for SD is typically 10-50 MB, trains in 10-60 minutes on a single consumer GPU, and loads at inference time as a drop-in modification.

Original: W_q : (d_in, d_out)   frozen
LoRA:     W_q + alpha * (A @ B)   where A : (d_in, r), B : (r, d_out)

r is typically 4-32.

LoRA is how almost every community fine-tune is distributed. CivitAI and Hugging Face host millions of them.

Schedulers you will see

• DDIM — deterministic, ~50 steps, simple.
• Euler ancestral — stochastic, 30-50 steps, slightly more creative samples.
• DPM-Solver++ 2M Karras — deterministic, 20-30 steps, production default.
• LCM / TCD / Turbo — consistency models and distilled variants; 1-4 steps at the cost of some quality.

Swapping schedulers is a one-line change in diffusers and sometimes fixes sample issues without any retraining.

cv3-latent-compression

Build It

This lesson uses diffusers end-to-end rather than rebuilding Stable Diffusion from scratch. The pieces you would need to rebuild (VAE, text encoder, U-Net, scheduler) are topics of their own lessons; here the goal is fluency with the production API.

Step 1: Text-to-image

import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline

pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(
    "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16,
).to("cuda")

image = pipe(
    prompt="a dog riding a skateboard in tokyo, studio ghibli style",
    guidance_scale=7.5,
    num_inference_steps=25,
    generator=torch.Generator("cuda").manual_seed(42),
).images[0]
image.save("dog.png")

float16 halves VRAM with no visible quality loss. num_inference_steps=25 with the default DPM-Solver++ matches num_inference_steps=50 with DDIM.

Step 2: Swap the scheduler

from diffusers import DPMSolverMultistepScheduler, EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler

pipe.scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler.from_config(pipe.scheduler.config)
pipe.scheduler = EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler.from_config(pipe.scheduler.config)

Scheduler state is decoupled from U-Net weights. You can train on DDPM and sample with any scheduler.

Step 3: Image-to-image

from diffusers import StableDiffusionImg2ImgPipeline
from PIL import Image

img2img = StableDiffusionImg2ImgPipeline.from_pretrained(
    "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16,
).to("cuda")

init_image = Image.open("dog.png").convert("RGB").resize((512, 512))
out = img2img(
    prompt="a dog riding a skateboard, oil painting",
    image=init_image,
    strength=0.6,
    guidance_scale=7.5,
).images[0]

strength is how much noise to add before denoising (0.0 = unchanged, 1.0 = full regeneration). 0.5-0.7 is the standard range for style transfer.

Step 4: Inpainting

from diffusers import StableDiffusionInpaintPipeline

inpaint = StableDiffusionInpaintPipeline.from_pretrained(
    "runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting",
    torch_dtype=torch.float16,
).to("cuda")

image = Image.open("dog.png").convert("RGB").resize((512, 512))
mask = Image.open("dog_mask.png").convert("L").resize((512, 512))

out = inpaint(
    prompt="a cat",
    image=image,
    mask_image=mask,
    guidance_scale=7.5,
).images[0]

White pixels in the mask are the area to regenerate. Black pixels are preserved.

Step 5: LoRA loading

pipe.load_lora_weights(
    "artificialguybr/studioghibli-redmond-1-5v-studio-ghibli-lora-for-liberteredmond-sd-1-5",
    weight_name="StudioGhibliRedmond-15V-LiberteRedmond-StdGBRedmAF-StudioGhibli.safetensors",
)
pipe.fuse_lora(lora_scale=0.8)

image = pipe(prompt="a village square, StdGBRedmAF, Studio Ghibli").images[0]

The trigger phrase from the model card (StdGBRedmAF, Studio Ghibli) switches the style on. lora_scale controls strength; 0.0 = no effect, 1.0 = full effect. fuse_lora bakes the adapter into the weights in place for speed, but prevents swapping. Call pipe.unfuse_lora() before loading a different adapter.

Step 6: LoRA training (sketch)

Real LoRA training lives in peft or diffusers.training. The outline:

# Pseudocode
for step, batch in enumerate(dataloader):
    images, prompts = batch
    latents = vae.encode(images).latent_dist.sample() * 0.18215

    t = torch.randint(0, num_train_timesteps, (batch_size,))
    noise = torch.randn_like(latents)
    noisy_latents = scheduler.add_noise(latents, noise, t)

    text_emb = text_encoder(tokenizer(prompts))

    pred_noise = unet(noisy_latents, t, text_emb)  # LoRA weights injected here

    loss = F.mse_loss(pred_noise, noise)
    loss.backward()
    optimizer.step()

Only the LoRA matrices receive gradient; the base U-Net, VAE, and text encoder are frozen. With a batch size of 1 and gradient checkpointing this fits in 8 GB of VRAM.

Use It

In production, the decisions you actually make:

• Model family: SD 1.5 for open-source community fine-tunes, SDXL for higher fidelity, SD3 / FLUX for state of the art and strict licensing requirements.
• Scheduler: DPM-Solver++ 2M Karras for 20-30 steps, LCM-LoRA when latency is under 1s.
• Precision: float16 on 4080/4090, bfloat16 on A100 and newer, int8 (via bitsandbytes) when VRAM is tight.
• Conditioning: plain text works; for stronger control, add ControlNet (canny, depth, pose) on top of the base pipeline.

For batch generation, AUTO1111 / ComfyUI are the community tools; for production APIs, diffusers + accelerate or optimum-nvidia with TensorRT compilation.

Ship It

This lesson produces:

• outputs/prompt-sd-pipeline-planner.md — a prompt that picks SD 1.5 / SDXL / SD3 / FLUX plus scheduler and precision given a latency budget, fidelity target, and licensing constraint.
• outputs/skill-lora-training-setup.md — a skill that writes a full LoRA training config for a custom dataset including captions, rank, batch size, and learning rate.

Exercises

1. (Easy) Generate the same prompt with guidance_scale in [1, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, 15]. Describe how the image changes. At what guidance value do artefacts appear?
2. (Medium) Take any real photograph, run it through StableDiffusionImg2ImgPipeline at strength in [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0]. Which strength preserves composition while changing style? Why does 1.0 ignore the input entirely?
3. (Hard) Train a LoRA on 10-20 images of a single subject (a pet, a logo, a character) and generate novel scenes with that subject in them. Report the LoRA rank and training steps that produced the best identity preservation without overfitting to the input images.

Key Terms

Further Reading

• High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion (Rombach et al., 2022) — the Stable Diffusion paper; includes every ablation that justifies the design
• Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance (Ho & Salimans, 2022) — the CFG paper
• LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models (Hu et al., 2021) — LoRA was NLP-first; it transferred to SD with almost no changes
• diffusers documentation — the reference for every SD / SDXL / SD3 / FLUX pipeline